Intelligent Design Theory (ID) has been much maligned recently as Neo-Creationist pseudoscience.
This paper looks briefly at the common arguments used against ID, including
arguments from methodological naturalism (MN), falsifiability, productivity, and religious
fundamentalism. Ultimately it goes on to explain why the theory could be beneficial to our
society today and suggests a need for a methodology of studying nature that exists alongside
traditional science yet is not based on the precept of MN.
Since

(this makes my head hurt just looking at it!)